Monday, 18 March 2013

Getting Back Together with Brands


Final Reflection and Farewell 
           
      Again, I am sorry that I have been so long with this final post. I have been very busy with course work lately. Nothing particularly interesting happened on the last day of my week without branding. However, I was looking forward to “getting back together” with my brands. I couldn’t wait to start consuming, buying, eating and wearing “my” brands again.
Notice how I said “my brands” as it is true that, in doing this exercise, I came to understand that my brands are very much a part of my identity. I associate the brands I wear with who I am. Being without these brands for even a week was difficult. It required me to question why I buy these brands. Moreover, It required me to come to the conclusion that a lot of why I bought these brands was because I like these things and that I want to express my likes to others. For instance, I like a certain type or clothing, or have a certain style, and I found I buy clothes to show this. Although other factors certainly influenced why I bought this brand over brands with similar styles, such as cost.
Furthermore, I have to admit that going with out brands was hard. In fact, living without any brands was impossible. There were many brands, such as nation branding, that I could not reasonably avoid. Yet, beyond that it was also difficult to avoid those brands that could reasonably be avoided. I admit that I missed consuming (buying, eating, using) the brands that I would usually consume. Not buying brands limited some of my choices because I could not get some products unbranded, think websites like Facebook. More than that though it was a difficult challenge because it took more effort to buy non-branded products. I could not just buy things wherever I was, such as on campus, but had to go to specific stores to get non-branded products. For me during this “breakup” I had to go to Loblaw’s to get most of my food, but where would I go to get generic or non-branded clothes? I don’t even know, and I think many others probably don’t know, where to get most of these products. Difficulties such as this means that even avoiding branding for a week was hard to accomplish, and in fact I did not fully accomplish this (look at my blog about cheating on my breakup).
In fact, as soon as my activity was over I went out a bought a lot of branded products that I had missed. The first of which was Tim Horton’s; I bought a lot of Tim Horton’s in the first few days after I started consuming brands again. I also wore some clothing that had obvious labels, but which I really like, that I had been avoiding for that week. It is clear that this is non-branding is not going to be part of my everyday life from now on.
            What then, if anything, did this avoidance of branding for a week do? What could this avoidance do in the long run? I don’t think that my avoidance of brands for a week would have affected the companies of the brands I usually consume. It did, however, make me aware of how I consume brands and how hard it is to avoid them. Moreover, in discussing my avoidance with friends I believe it could also make them aware. Perhaps on a larger scale this could affect the companies who make the brand. If everyone, or many, refused to buy these brands then the companies would have trouble staying afloat. However, this would probably take a lot of people when you consider that many people refuse to shop at Wal-Mart but it is still running. Perhaps, avoiding these brands may also make generic brands so popular that they become a dominant brand themselves. If everyone bought President’s Choice products, for instance, I would expect that Loblaw’s stores would expand or that they would expand their brand to be sold in other stores or elsewhere. Could it be that the generic brand would become the new dominant brand? I do think, however, that I doing this activism one can become aware of the dominance of branding and their own consumption. Also it can bring it to the attention to others. Perhaps in making people more aware people will then come to demand less branded products. Or maybe people will change their consumption patterns entirely. They might begin to be involved in things like DIY or craftivism. This is just my thinking and reflection on this type of activism but I may look at scholarly articles or others ideas on this anti-brand activism in my paper.
            So in reflecting on my week without branding I have come to the end of my blog. This will be my final entry. However, I may go back and add further thoughts to my past entries if I feel it is needed.  Thank you to everyone who has read or will read this blog. Goodbye!

Saturday, 9 March 2013

Becoming a Homebody


How Staying at Eased the Breakup

Consumption Diary

Breakfast: President’s Choice cornflakes and President’s Choice Organics soymilk

Lunch: No Name macaroni and No Name cheese

Dinner: No Name perogies

Today’s Reflection on my Breakup

            Today actually went fairly well as far as avoiding branded products. Perhaps this is because I cheated on my breakup yesterday and had new determination to do well today. Yet, I think what is more important is that today I was at home all day. Being at home and away from the temptations of branded products, fast food places and seeing what others were eating was, I think, a big help. Also I did not have any of my friends to pressure me into eating whatever they were eating, as they often do. It seems, therefore, that there are some social pressures involved in one’s desire to buy branded foods. Having taken myself away from such social pressures for a day I found that it was easier to resist consuming branded products.

I wonder what some other ways, rather than just avoiding social settings could help one resist buying branded products? If friends, companies and other institutions offering more non-branded products would this make it easier? 

Friday, 8 March 2013

Cheating on my Breakup


Excuses, Excuses, Excuses

Consumption Diary

Breakfast: President’s Choice Peanut Butter Granola Bar

Lunch: Pizza Pizza cheese pizza

Dinner: No Name perogies  


Today’s Reflection on my Breakup

            So I am somewhat impressed with myself, I made it to the fourth day of attempting to avoid branding before “cheating.” Until today I have not bought or used anything that was branded except for those products or services that were unavoidable (refer to the list of unavoidable products/services in my life in the post “Breaking up with The Brand”).  Today, at about 8:00 am, I left my house in a hurry in order to get to school in time to write a short proposal before class. In my dash out the door to make the bus I only had time to grab a granola bar for breakfast. Come 1:00 pm after finishing my paper and sitting through part of my class I was starving. My stomach was grumbling and I started to get tired and dizzy (something that often happens when I haven’t eaten for a while). Since, it would still be a long time before I would be going home from school (at least 3 hours) I decided to buy something to eat.
            What to buy though? Well interesting enough deciding to buy something on campus meant having to buy something that is branded. Everything that one can buy on campus is either branded or at least some ingredients that are branded. Most of the food service locations on campus are in themselves a brand and package and sell their products under a brand name. These include Tim Hortons, Subway, Pizza Pizza and A&W. Even in the Cafeteria or Roosters where the branding is less obvious or at least where things are not sold under a big brand. Within the Cafeteria or Roosters the ingredients within the products they sell are branded. For instance, Roosters uses a particular brand of pitas, offers Kraft peanut butter and uses Mayo brand Mayonnaise.  It is likely that one could not order something from these places that would not include something that is branded. So in order to eat (and not starve) I had to buy something branded and go back on my “breakup” with brands today.
            I will acknowledge that what I have done here is to come up with a fairly elaborate excuse for why I had to buy something branded. It was in fact my fault that I had to buy something branded because I was not prepared enough while leaving for school today. What is relevant about this is that it shows the difficulty in buying only branded things. It is up to the individual to be prepared and to put in more time and work to avoid brands. It is not that society or companies make it easy to buy unbranded products. In fact, within spaces such as the university products or services that are not branded are not offered. Individuals, in conclusion, must “go out of their way” to consume generic or store bought goods. 

Thursday, 7 March 2013

Doubting my Breakup with Brands


Facebook Withdrawal 
Consumption Diary

Breakfast: President’s Choice peanut butter granola and a banana (Chiquita)

Brunch: Baker’s Raven’s Breakfast (had a meeting)

Dinner: all store brand nacho's - President's Choice Tortilla Chips, Simply Good Salsa, Farmer's Pick extra lean ground beef and no name cheese

Bought Items:
  • Simply Good Shopper's store brand Salsa
Today’s Reflection on My Breakup

            The third day since my “break-up with brands” I am already starting to regret the split. It is not too hard to spend a week away from my favorite branded foods and goodies. I have not touched a single Lindor chocolate, Delissio frozen pizza or Starbuck’s drink. What is extremely difficult for me is staying off of Facebook for a week.




Yes, that is right I will admit it I am a facebook addict. I use facebook multiple times during the day. I check what my friends are doing and what events are happening in the city or on campus. I chat with my friends online, discussing our social lives, school work and just generally complaining (“I only got three hours of sleep last night, how bout you?”). I even get most of my news from facebook. My friends are very well informed and often repost and discuss things they see in local newspapers or online. Facebook is also useful for me when I am bored. I often go on facebook when waiting for something, on the bus ride to school or admittedly during some classes (But of course not Power and Everyday Life class). Facebook also serves as a good break from studying. When I just cannot stand to look at my readings or work on an assignment any longer I will go on facebook for five minutes. Then refreshed to my studies. Facebook, therefore, serves a lot of uses in my life from mediating my communication with others and informing me on local issues, to providing relief from boredom and, what I will call, “study wear-out.”
Considering all the things I use facebook for perhaps you could understand why it is so hard to break the habit of constantly looking at the website. Or perhaps you are a person who does not have Facebook and does not understand my addiction at all. Nevertheless, when Facebook came up in one of my communications classes today I found myself going to type in the websites address into my search bar.
Unfortunately though facebook is a brand. There are a number of social media sites one could chose from and all include their own name/ brand. Some of the social media site names include Twitter, Tumbler, MySpace and Instagram. Each of these websites serve similar but slightly different services. They are all used to send messages or images to others. Some sites can send these messages or images directly to someone, other sites one uses to send messages to a group of people. In the latter case one may not even be certain who will receive these message and who will not.  For instance, on Facebook I just read what comes up on my wall so I will not likely read someone’s message if it is not shown here. These websites also differ in the ways they are used. So, while I use Facebook to post pictures and messages, as well as read articles, I would likely only use Instagram to send pictures, possibly with a caption or message attached. That some things are not possible on certain sites says something about what people can do on these sites, and therefore about power. Moreover, these websites can brand themselves in reference to these aspects of their website. For instance, on the sign-up/in page Facebook says, “it helps you connect and share with the people in your life.” To reinforce this page site also icons that represent people that are connected to one another over a map of the world; showing how people are connected in this way.


           
Due, to how facebook is set up, mainly what it allows on to do, and because it is marketed as a way to connect people facebook is clearly a brand. Therefore, it is something I will have to avoid for this week. Wish me luck.

Works Cited

Wednesday, 6 March 2013

An Escape That Would be Out of This World


I Am Canadian, Friendly Manitoba and Discovering Ontario

Breakfast: President’s Choice corn flakes and President’s Choice organic soymilk

Dinner: Farmer’s Pick bakery bun and no-name cheese sandwich

Other:
·      Life brand Acetaminophen 
·      Staples brand paper
·      Paper-mate Pen (did not have any unbranded pens at home and did not want to leave the house to buy some)

Today’s Reflection on the Breakup

            So it is day two since I have decided to leave my brands behind. Today’s reflection… that leaving behind brands may well mean having to leave behind the entire planet. Clearly I do not intend on traveling to outer space this week, but it seems that whether I stay in Canada or leave for any other destination on Earth I will be within a brand. That brand is the nation brand. Many countries and even provinces are branded.
            Looking just at Canada, for instance, one can see how the country is branded and how citizens, myself included, live this brand. You probably remember, “I Am Canadian” Molson’s Canadian’s beer advertisement.
           
            In this advertisement Joe, the speaker, dispels some myths or stereotypes about Canada and then goes on to say what makes one Canadian. He implies, for instance, that Canadians are nice, diverse, speak English and French and are interested or play hockey. Whether true or not these are certainly things that many in Canada would say is Canadian or at least seen to be Canadian. Furthermore, Canada promotes itself to others in similar ways. Consider the Vancouver Olympics, for example, where Canada featured what it referred to as the “cultural” part of the opening ceremony, which was a dance preformed by First Nations peoples. Canada certainly, therefore, promotes itself as multicultural. To be in Canada, therefore, is to live within a brand, a branded nation. Within this branded nation ones actions, such as going to a Sens game, could be seen as “living” or promoting the brand.
            Provinces are also branded. Manitoba the province I was born in and where most of my family is from is branded “friendly Manitoba.” This slogan is very well known and is even on the Manitoba license plates (Although since the Jets hockey team returned to the city many people have paid extra to have Jets license plates). Based on my experiences in Manitoba I would say that people certainly “live” their brand. People seem to be nicer, or at least friendlier, than in other provinces. Rarely will someone walk down a street without having the person who passes them buy wave, say hello, or acknowledge their presence in some other way. It also seems very interesting to me that Manitoba can still maintain its “brand” of “friendly Manitoba” despite the high crime rate of the province, especially within downtown Winnipeg.
            Ontario, on the other hand, is branded as adventurous, outdoorsy and fun. At least these are the words that come to my mind when I watch the “Ontario-Yours to Discover” advertisements (see example below).

            Currently, I am living within this Ontario, this province branded yours to discover. I cannot, therefore, escape branding altogether simply because I live within this province. Moreover, perhaps I could even be said to be upholding this brand. I certainly have done a number of the things shown on the above advertising; back home we even have a pair of snowshoes. I have also traveled many places within Ontario. As mentioned before I come from a small city in Northwestern Ontario and travel here for school. Yet, as I also mentioned I spent my first year studying in Toronto. In doing the activities and going to some of the places shown on the advertisement perhaps I have been “living” the Ontario brand.
            It seems already inevitable that I cannot escape the brand entirely. Branding is so much a part of my life that simply by virtue of being in a specific country and province I am immersed in a brand and the things I do can be seen to reinforce this brand. I wonder where one could, or if they could, possibly go anywhere to fully avoid “living” within or with brands? Today I leave you with this question.  


Works Cited
Vinko. (2006, May 22). I Am Canadian.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRI-A3vakVg.
Alexcalmoncanda. (2010, December 12). Ontario-Yours to Discover. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ0d9ONjVkg