Tuesday, 5 March 2013

An After Breakup Shopping Trip


Difficulties in No Brand Shopping 

Consumption Diary

Breakfast: President’s Choice Peanut Butter Granola Bar

Lunch: No name chicken noodle soup (In my opinion tasted better than the comparable Campbell’s brand)

Snack: President’s choice butter popcorn

Dinner: President’s choice tortilla chips, Farmer’s Pick extra lean ground beef, no name cheese, President’s choice salsa.

Clothes: Sorel Boots (label covered), short sleeve button-up shirt and jeans both without visible branding

Other:
·      OCTranspo bus (could have walked)
·      Google scholar and Carleton Library catalogues (could not find a source on Carleton that was needed for an assignment therefore forced to use the Google search engine)
·      Secret deodorant, different branded cosmetics, branded hair shampoo and conditioner (If I had available funds and time could find alternatives)
·      Room decorations
·      Ikea furniture
·      Dish soap (a shoppers store brand)  
·      Charmin Toilet Paper (could be Costco store brand but my roommate is in charge of buying this and has his own preferences)


Reflecting on my Breakup with Brands

            So similar to how most of my relationships end, the first thing I did when I broke up with branded products this week was to go shopping. I bought a bunch of new unbranded products that I could eat or otherwise consume this week. I was hoping that these products would give me something branded products could not, that they could be used as a form of activism against big brands.



            First stop on my shopping spree? The Independent store owned by McDonough but affiliated with the Loblaws Corporation. Here I picked up a ton of products that were either no name or president’s choice so that I would not starve for the next week. I found that it was quite easy to find Loblaw’s store brands in the dry goods departments. Almost all soups, crackers, cereals and other dry or canned foods had a generic or store brand alternative to the bigger corporate brands, such as Campbell’s and General Mills. One area, however, where store brands or non-branded foods were hard to find was the produce department. Most fruits and vegetables, rather than coming directly from local farms, come from big corporations that brand these foods; for instance, Sunkist oranges or Dole bananas. Furthermore, the meat department presented a more difficult problem than all of the others. Having worked in a grocery store for many years I know that the meat products that these stores bring in are often from large corporations, such as Schneider’s. Yet, while the products are marketed or “branded” towards the store, the meat is repackaged so that customers are often unaware of what brands their meat products are. It is, as a result, more difficult for customers to understand how and if these products are branded. Having no clue which brands these produces were, whether generic or non-generic, I chose not to buy meat from this store. A final thing I noticed on this shopping trip is that my bill was cheaper than usual. Perhaps this is because I was not buying higher priced items, mainly produce and meat, or maybe it is because the generic brands are cheaper than the brand-name products I usually buy.
            So I went to a second store in an attempt to get produce and meats that did not come from a big brand-name corporation. I went to Farmers Pick, which is supposed to get more of their produce locally and their meat straight from the farmers, hence the stores name. When I got their, however, I realized that most of their produce was from the United States or even another continent. The only two products that were from Canada, and did not say specifically where in Canada, were tomatoes and cucumbers. This is very different from how I remember it the last time I went to the store but perhaps the fact that it is winter makes it more difficult to find local or farm bought produce. Furthermore, had it been summer I would also have had the option to go to Byward market and purchase my produce directly from local farmers themselves. It seems that in buying produce I met my first challenge in committing to this anti-brand/ consumer activism. Not intending to go without fruits and vegetables this week I was forced to buy produce that was not generic or no name. The meats I bought at Farmer’s Pick, however, possibly came directly from farmers. Yet, it is hard to be certain of this because like Independent the store packages the meats in the store and uses a store label.
            Something I also noticed while at Farmer’s Pick is that while the store used to sell bulk items in small packages with the stores name on it they no longer do so. This was very disappointing for me because I wanted to by Gummy Bears but they were now branded (Jardi). This means that in order to meet my gummy bear craving I will have to make another trip to the Bulk Barn later this week.
            What I discovered through this shopping trip is that buying generic or non-branded products, though it seemed as though it would be easy, takes a lot of time and effort. Instead of going to one store to get all the groceries I wanted I had to go to three. I also could not buy certain products, particularly produce, that was not branded. It is day one of my breakup with branding and I am already having trouble leaving brands behind entirely. I think this really speaks to how prevalent brands have become in our society. I am interested to see the ways that I might have to cheat on my non-brand diet.
            

Monday, 4 March 2013

Breaking Up with My Brands


Brands... I Think We Need a Break 

Sorry to have been away from my blog for a few days; I am sure you have missed hearing about my branded life.

Last week you heard about some of the brands I consumed and what factors lead me to consume them. This week I am challenging myself to only consume generic or non-branded products or services. I will attempt to not buy, use, reuse, dispose of or in any way consume anything that is not a generic/store brand or unbranded (foods bought directly from a farmer). My posts for this week will discuss my experiences with this sort of anti-branding activism. I will keep a diary on the products and services I have consumed throughout the day. Furthermore, I will also discuss any challenges I had with this activism or activity. At the end of this week I intend to reflect on my activism and what affects, if any, I think such activism had or could have had on branding.

As a disclaimer there are some branded products or services that, as of now, I know I cannot reasonably avoid. The first is my computer; as a university student it is not reasonable for me to not use my computer this week and as previously discussed any other computer I could use would likely be branded. Similarly, I also cannot avoid the university itself, which is also a branded product. Moreover, although it may be true that some people can live without using a cellphone (mine is a Samsung Galaxy s2) I am not one of those people. My phone is my “lifeline” I talk to my parents on it, message friends on it and check bus times with it. In fact, as a young woman who often has to walk in isolated areas I feel that not having my phone would be a risk to my safety. I will also have to wear clothes for this week. Crazy right? I do not intend on making my own clothes or finding unbranded clothes, if that is even possible. Instead I will be using tape to cover up any logo, name, or other brand signifier on my clothes. I will also be using some of the beauty or hygienic products that I have at home that are branded because I cannot reasonably afford to buy and use other generic products. That being said anything that I can reasonably use in replacement of these products will be used. For instance, brushing my teeth with the generic baking soda in my cupboard (oh boy). Any other branded products and services that I cannot avoid will be mentioned in this week’s blogs.

Thursday, 28 February 2013

Emailing the Brand


Gmail and Cmail 

Act(s) of Consuming: Using/ Reusing

Product: Gmail Email Service and Cmail

Price: Free




Description: Macintosh HD:Users:chantellebrule:Downloads:yahoo.gif




Price of Simialar Products (different brands):
Hotmail
(same provider as cmail)
Free
Yahoo
Free


Why I chose these brands?:
            An interesting realization came to me today; I realized that the email service providers I use are in themselves brands. That Hotmail, Yahoo and Gmail are all “brands.” Having come to realize this I had to ask myself ‘Why do I use these services?’ Something that is interesting about my use of these services is that unlike many of my friends at Carleton I use two email providers. Many students have their school email automatically forward to their other email accounts so that everything is in one place. I on the other hand keep my Cmail and Gmail account separate have them both forward to my phone. In this way they are in the same place but I can separate my personal emails (Gmail) from my professional emails (Cmail). So while I get store offers sent to my Gmail account, I communicate with professors through my carleton provided account. In doing so I can keep my emails more organized and easier to access without worrying about sending an email. This is one of the main reasons that I have chosen to keep two separate email accounts.
            Moreover, it is important to consider why I chose these two email providers over other possibilities, such as Yahoo. For starters, since Carleton provides all students with a Cmail account I did not have a choice in using this service. Even if I did have my emails from this provider forwarded to another account with a different provider I would still be using my Cmail account in this way. Since, I would have to use my Cmail email address anyways for school related emails it did not seem worth it to forward it to a different service providers mail system. Especially, since I can get both of my account forwarded to my phone.
            On the other hand, I had more freedom in choosing to use Gmail as a second email provider. I was not required to have a Gmail account by another party, as was the case of Cmail. However, in order to use a certain number of Google’s other services one has to have a google, or Gmail, account. Even this blog which is a Google service requires me to sign in with a google email.
So the real question is what causes me to choose google services over others? The first possible reason is my familiarity with google as a search engine. I have been using Google as a search engine since I will younger. I found its quality better than Yahoo, my old search engine, and have never had trouble finding what I am looking for. Futhermore, as I continued to use Google’s search engine there were links to other services that I found would be useful in my everyday life. For instance, google maps to find my way around and map out transit routes, google books to preview books I wished to take out of the library, and google scholar to look up scholarly articles. Due to the link structure and my previous experience with Google I therefore decided that I could ‘trust’ the quality of the Gmail email service.
Secondly, Google is also greately popular and many people I know use it. As a result, there is a bit more pressure to use this service than others. Using google is almost like being part of a very large “club” of Google users. This “club” defines itself against users of other search engines such as Bing. The only person I know who uses Bing is my dad who has a very minimal understanding of computers. In fact, rather than saying “search it” to someone it is more common for one to say “google it.” This is common language among almost all of the people I know and shows how popular or well-known google is. There is also pressure to use these services because people tend to invite their friends to use services with them. For instance, people I form study groups with often like to use Google documents to collaborate on notes.
Lastly, other companies also pressure, though they do not require, people to use google. When I first bought my Macbook the google search bar was already installed as part of the internet window. When I got my new Android phone (also a brand) I the applications stores that one could download from, that were already set up on it, were the Samsung store but also the “Google Play” store. These examples show that there is some pressure, not just from people one knows personally, but from other companies to use google services.

Works Cited

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

In the Service of the Brand


Purolator Package and Carleton University
 

Act(s) of consuming: Using

Product: Purolator Envolope – Ink Cartridge Shipment from HP (USA)
Arrived 10:30am the day after ordering


Price:
Free for myelf but based on purolator’s website would have cost the company approximately $20




Price of Simialar Products (different brands):
Xpresspost USA
Prepaid Envolpe
$21.75
Ships in 2-3 days

Why I chose this brand?:
            Today a package came in the mail, printer ink that I had been expected from HP’s online store. I did not have a say in choosing this brand and was upset by this. Why upset by this? Well, for starters, neither of my roommates nor I were home; therefore instead of the package being delivers a slip was dropped off telling me to go to the Purolator store to pick up the package. The Purolator store is in a very inconvenient location from where I live. It takes me two buses and a ten minute walk to get there on a good day. Today Ottawa had a storm so it would have taken me much longer. As a result, I will now be waiting till another day to get my package. Due to the inconvenience of the stores location when I have a choice I send or receive mail through Canada Post. Unlike Purolator, Canada post has a location that is within walking distance of my home and therefore very easy to get to.
            Another reason that I generally use Canada Post over Puraltor is that Canada Post is government run, whereas Purolator is a private corporation. I am not sure why but the fact that Canada Post is governmentally owned gives me more confidence in the companies services. However, I have had previous dealing with both companies, and my experiences with Canada Post have not always been ideal. For instance, the express post packages I send to and from my hometown, Kenora, often do not arrive till after the three day promised shipping time. There have also been a number of times when I specified that I did not want the package left outside and it was. On the other hand, I have never had any unplesant experiences with Purolator. The company has always delivered my packages on time and followed my delivery instructions. This discussion has therefore caused me to question why I trust Canada Post as a public corporation over Purolator a privately owned company. Perhaps it is because I have a general dislike or big corporations. Where possible I often try to support small businesses, such as family owned restuarants or coffeehouses. I certianly do not have full faith in the Canadian government but the notion of a public corporation seems more appealing than a privately owned one where coporate elites and large stockholders are in control.

Limitations on choice?:
            As I have mentioned I had no choice, or at least assume that I had no choice, in choosing between Purolator or another shipping company. When I placed my order online I was asked to pick a speed in which I wanted my package delivered. Since all shipping times were free I chose the least amount of time to have it shipped by, being the next day. It did not appear as though I had a choice between companies only times. However, maybe had a chosen a slower shipping speed HP would have used another shipping company to send the package. Or perhaps I could have called and requested a different shipping company been used. That being said, it did not appear to me at the time of placing my order that I had a choice between services.
            The speed in which I needed the package was also a limitation on my choice. Since my ink cartriges were close to being empty and therefore I would not be able to print at home if the new ink cartriges did not arrrive in the next few days I picked the shortest shipping time. As I said before it is possible that the slower shipping speeds would have meant that another shipping company would be used. If this was so then had I not been in urgent need of getting my package I would have had more choice between corporations.
            It should be noted that for the first time since beginning this blog cost did not seem to play a factor in deciding which “brand” or shipping company to go with. As I have said each of the possible shipping times given by HP was the same price and HP did not appear to offer a decision between shipping companies. However, if one requested another company be used this may cost them more money and therefore those with more money would have the advantage of being more easily to make such a decision than those with lower incomes.

Act(s) of consuming: Using

Product: Carleton University Bacholars Degree

Price: approximately $6300.00  per year

Price of Simialar Products (different brands):
University of Manitoba
Approximately 4-5 thousand
Per year
(Brittany Seradski)
York University
Approximately $6,500.00
Per year 
(Jason Webster)
Queen’s University
Approximately 6-7 thousand
Per year
(Jamie Casigay)

Why I chose this brand?:
            When I was first planning to go to University I always thought that I would be attending Univeristy of Manitoba. This University is one of the closest to my hometown and where my mother and father live, Kenora. The school being only three hours away I would be able to go visit my parents on some weekends and holidays. Furthermore, my aunt, uncle, and four of my cousins had graduated from University of Manitoba. These were also the only family members who I was close to who had graduated from any university. I was, therefore, looking forward to spending more time with them in the city and gettting advice from them about school. Yet, when I when I was deciding which program I would take in University I soon realized that the program I wished to take, Human Rights, was not offered in any of the Manitoban universities.
            Not being able to take the human rights program close to home I decided to go to York University for Human Rights. This school got great reviews, was in a big city and met my need to try something new. It also had more Vegan food options on campus than any other university. This may seem to you to be a bad reason to choose a school, but being Vegan was, at the time, was a very important aspect of my idenity. Not wanting to have difficulty finding Vegan food and staying healthy I chose the university that offered me the most options to fit my lifestyle. This along with the amazing professors I got to experience and some lifelong friends were some of the best things I remember from York University. A good education and good friends are important to me. Yet, my general expeirence at York was unpleasant. I was bullied on my residence floor and had a lot of difficulty, coming from a small town, ajusting to “life in the big city.” So, I transferred to Carleton.
            Carleton had been my second choice of universities at the end of highschool. That I was adding a Communication Studies major to my degree was the biggest influence in choosing this school to transfer to. Carleton has a very acclaimed communication studies program and is one of the only schools where one can double major in both of these programs. Secondly, the school was also offering me more scholarship money than any of the other schools I applied to. Lastly, that Carleton was in Ottawa, the capital of Canada, also had an influence on my decision. As Canada’s capital people often talk about Ottawa getting more resources and attention. For instance, many people had mentioned to me that unlike other cities Ottawa’s streets and other public areas are always kept clean. Carleton also seems to take into consideration that it is located in Canada’s capital and that this has meaning in its branding. Carleton brands itself as “Canada’s Capital University.” In using this logo Carleton suggests both that Carleton is a “top” university but also that there is some significance to the school being in Canada’s capital city. This type of branding seems to support the idea or assumption that living in Ottawa is better than living in some other cities.

Limitations on choice?:
            As in most of my earlier posts one’s income influenced their decision to consume a particular brand. This is also the same for universties where attending certain schools costs more or less than others. Those who cannot afford a more expensive school like Queens, for instance, are more likely to attend a school such as University of Manitoba that costs half the tuition price. Students who come from other countries and wish to study in Canada may be especially disadvantaged by these tuition costs. International students are expected to pay a much larger amount of money than domestic students. Carleton, as an example, charges international students almost twice as much to study at the school, approximately $18,800.00. Ones nationality or place of birth, therefore, can affect how much one pays for post-secondary schooling in Canada, and therefore where or if they study in Canada. Similarily, where one lives within Canada may also affect where they study. Travel costs within Canada vary based on where one lives and where ones school is. So while the travel costs to get to Winnipeg from Kenora is about $50.00 - $150.00, to depending on mode of transportation, it costs approximately $300.00- $600.00 to fly to travel from Kenora to Ottawa, depending on the date one is flying. One who does not have the money to spend on such travel expenses would therefore be unable to attend a school this far away from home.
            Another factor that might limit ones choice of university is whether or not the university accepts their application. The university has to chose who to accept into the school and who to refuse and will only accept a certain number of individuals. Those who do not get accepted do not have the opporunity to attend the university. Moreover, those who get into some universities and not others will also have a more limited choice in which university to attend. Luckily for me, however, I got accepted into each of the schools I applied to and was able to chose between them. Yet, I was limited in only being able to apply to three schools without being charged more money. I am also unable to be registered in more than one school at a time which also limits my choice and my decisions about courses are limited to the school I am attending. If Univeristy of Ottawa offered a course I wished to take I would not be able to because I am not attending that school but Carleton.
            Finally, another factor that does not currenlty limit myself but could limit others is accessibility. According to my friends who have physically disabilities, a number of who are in wheelchairs, Carleton is supposed to be one of the most accessible campuses. This suggests that those with disabilities would not be able to attend other universities because they are more difficult to get around in. One event that draws attention to the lack of accessibility on campuses, particularly on Carleton campus is the Wheelchair challenge. This event occurs every year and challenges students to get around campus in a wheeelchair for a day.


Works Cited
Casigay, J. Personal communication.
Cassie. Carleton Unversity Wheelchair Challenge. Retrieved from http://admissions.carleton.ca/2012/carleton-university-wheelchair-challenge.
Seradski, B. Personal Communication.
Webster, J. Personal Communication.